>>1
Women in hentai are always idealized. They often have a look of geniune pleasure or some form of sexual relief. They are often portrayed in a fantastic situation. Not only that but it is so specialized that you can find almost anything you want. Also hentai features "characters" who are often more humanized than the airbrushed Playboy models or the camwhores with crappy webcams.
I guess I'm willing to argue that not only is hentai porn but it's more so porn than most of the "real" porn out there. Women in "real" porn look more fake than hentai women. Which is ironic because both try to imitate sexyness and the representation of the simulation is almost always better than the simulation itself. Because like I said earlier, it is idealized.
Hentai is hyperreal. Consider the porn that would be the closest to reality. It would be the amature infront of a crappy camera. This is because most real women are not on well lit sets and do not have the luxury of a skilled photographer or an expensive camera. However, in this instance it will surely loose the reason it was even being made in the first place: to be sexy. So if the real isn't sexy. Why would you consider a real women simulating sexyness any less real or sexy than a drawn picture simulating sexyness. Using this same logic, the ultimate unreal porn would be read. The representation of the simulation transcends it's form to become a symbol or a series of symbols. Thus acheiving the ultimate sexyness, the abstract sex created by the mind. It becomes a concept.
Either way, your behind a fucking screen so both are equally fake. I'm done. I hope this becomes copy pasta in the near future.