Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

WTF is not4chan.org?

Name: adsf 2006-06-03 17:31

as title, why is there only loli and shota crap there?
isn't loli andshota illegal in US? how come such site is open?

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-25 14:55

>>42  about those Japanese life sizelove dolls, made to look like little girls?

      That is a really good question.  I guess it would have to go to court to determine that, however I can make a series of logical judegments and make an assumption.
      1)  The law says nothing specifically stating the type of pornography.  If it is a drawing, CG design, video, story, ect.  I would assume that a statue of nude kids in sexual positions or even two kids fucking would also be covered by this.
      2)  Putting a life size doll in the same category as a statue is not that far-fetched of an idea.  actaully "life-size" is irrelevent in this case as even if you made the statue the size of the Statue of Liberty or as small as your finger, it is still depicting the same thing.
      3)  if the doll is dressed, as long as it isn't in a sexualy explicit pose it should be fine.  Kind of like a kid is alowed to be photographed with clothes on, or even in swimsuit or underwear as long as the poses aren't sexually explicit.  However, seeing as the doll is undressable and poseable and anotomically correct, I don't know how much evidence it would require to say it was sexual in nature.  I guess sperm tests of the inside would work, so use a rubber just like you do with the real girls.
      As for molesting the doll, it isn't a real person so you can't get charged with molesting someone that doesn't exist.  Same way if you stabbed it with a knife you couldn't get charged with murdering the doll.
       4)Everything I mentioned holding true, and the defendant has nothing else but the sex doll, I think it is possibe under the law to try and convict them.  However this is extreemly unlikely to happen that way.  It will most likely be brought up as further evidence on a person that is being charged with posessing real child porn.  I seriously doubt you would be put on trial for only posessing the sex doll.

                I don't guarantee any of this, I am not a lawyer, this is assumption based on my limited knowlege of law.  This is based on US law and no other.  I would like to hear thoughts on what canada would do or any other nation.  In the end I really don't know what the fuck would happen if this were taken to court as it isn't exactly something with legal presidence, but it is still an interesting mind exercise, and a valid question.  You can always try to ask a lawyer:)  It might be fun to see his face when you ask him the question, and you have confidentiality so he can't tell anyone you asked unless it is illegal and you tell him you plan on doing it.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List