>>18
It's drawn pornography. drawn ponograpy is artifical pornograpy it doesn't invovle real people, same for written. child pornography is pornography involving children, milf ponography is pornography containing milf, anal pornography is pornography containing anal.
Therefore it is arificial child pornography. Your emphasis is making it art, where my empasis is that it is fucking artifical. The definition of art is very broad. real pornography can be art i guess. Real child pornography can be art. being photographic i guess photography is defined as art. And all forms of drawn and written anything is art. I mean if rap is art, than artifical child pornography definately is. Nobody ever said that all art is legal. Art that harms others or their property is still illegal, it dammages your propery. That is why REAL child porn is illegal, it harms the child. Artifical doesn't have a real child in it. I can draw a picture of a murder, that doesn't make me a killer. If we allow that distinction to fall here, we have to allow it to fall in all those places as well. I can hit your car with a sledge hammer and make it modern art, that doesn't make it legal for me to do that. And you didn't answer the question. Do you really want to take it to court and becme famous along those lines. I mean there is nothing to say you absoluely will. I have no idea who took it to court in 2002. But are you willing to take it that far and risk becoming famous for that. Are you willing to spend all those years in jail waiting for the court to listen to you being in prision as a PEDOPHILE, i am sure that will be a pleasant experience. Not to mention the Justices have changed a little, it's possible the court won't throw out the charges.