>>975
That's actually the attitude I was talking about. Disinterest in a female eventually fosters feelings of inadequacy, leading to a resting potential at which any positive interaction is seen as a sociologyical victory for said female. I didn't really want to get all psychological up there, but since you're of this calibre, you'll understand that while a romantic person may see courtship as the establishment of romantic love, in actuality the exchange is perceived by the other party as a series of interactions to increase one's standing in another's perception. The point is not to be openly hostile, but rather be consistently nonchalant.
Dropping down a level here, you guys have read Pride and Prejudice, right? Even the intelligent females will go after complete assholes despite their distaste for the archetype. The dynamic evolution of the relationship seems to be some sort of ideological boon for females.
>>978
>>979
I did just that as well. Might as well be the arrogant playboy than the angsting sweetheart. Why should I have to make constant concessions to receive nothing where equal treatment of all peoples does a much better job?
>>980
There is -no- such thing as a special someone. Predestination, soulmates, all that crap is bull to feed the fires. If two compatible people court and find a beneficial and rewarding relationship, it can result in a big success. The thing is, failures are not fatal in love. Keep trying, it's just statistics, you're guarenteed a hit. Unless you're Snacks. Then you're only compatible with yourself.
>>982
Then said girl isn't a very good girlfriend. She's got to learn to make some concessions on her end to make sure they meet halfway.