12chan are a bunch of hypocrites!

The other day I was browsing around their board for Female JB. Found a thread with pictures of JB in black latex. Someone asked for sauce, so I googled at the text in one of the corners. ("Jenny" and "xam".) Found a link and posted it, but the board wouldn't accept it. Must be some spamcountering, so I run the link trough tinyurl and posted that new link.

Then a couple of days later I see that I'm banned for linking to a site with child porn. But the images at that site are no more risque than the pictures already posted.

Anyone who's experienced similar hypocrisy from 12chan or other boards?

>>25
It's full of /pedo/ shit, to be more precise.  It's mostly CM and "candid" pics of girls 11-12 and under (mostly under).  Nudity is against the rules, but pretty much anything else goes.  One of the staples appears to be a "Girls in Diapers" thread.  There are lots of NN selections from the "Little Stars" sets (the full sets are very much CP), also.

Actually, now that I think about it, /pedo/ wasn't HALF as bad as /girl/.  Unfortunately, there are one or two models who are NOW JB, that the denizens of /jb/ sage the shit out of because the UESD to be pedobait.  Meanwhile, /girl/ often complains that they are now "fat" (i.e., they now have tits and hips) or are "grandmas," but usually lets the thread go on since it attracts older pics as well as new ones.  This is mostly the case with Sandra.  What this means is that to get even recent Sandra pics (she's 16 now, I think, and quite hittable, IMO) you often have to brave /girl/.

I'm a seasoned /b/tard: it's very hard to creep me out or turn my stomach, but /girl/ does the trick every time.