>>9
What I don't get is why all the dubsfags have decided to shit up THIS board as well.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-22 17:41
>>12
What do you mean dubs fags, most of the times these threads don't reach double numbers
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-22 17:44
Omg what is this place where are teh pictures? Is this the old 4chan?
Also check out my 14
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-22 17:50
>>13
I guess numberfags would be a more apt term, but basically anyone who thinks they're oh so cheeky for asking you to check their [X]. If I were moot, I'd spend less time pissing on my servers and more time making that a bannable offense.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-22 17:51
I wonder how it feels to be the person who posts last before it freezes.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-22 18:11
>>16
If they put a lot of effort into their post, they'd probably be a mite pissed, you know?
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-22 18:41
THE TRUE IS OUT THERE!
EXTRA EXTRA BYUU AND YEAH MAN FITZORY CRYING AND OWNED BY ONE MAN ARMY NAMED TEPLES
So, let me get this straight: byuu gets upset that the discussion isn't going his way and decides he only wants to discuss it on his own turf. Fine, whatever. But locking the thread to prevent others from continuing the discussion accomplishes what, exactly? Not a good precedent...
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-22 18:43
I have to laugh a bit when I hear people talking about code as a substitute for documentation. Un-commented code like BSNES (I haven't seen MAME) will never be a substitute for documentation. First, it's useless to anyone who isn't proficient in the language it was written in. That means it's useless to anyone in the world interested in the SNES, but not proficient in C++. You know, people who 'just' read English or any other written language. Programming languages are an extremely poor choice for communication between humans. Also, people who 'just' know 10 other programming languages, but not C++. Or, they know C++, but not to the level of byuu. I'd guess that eliminates the majority the interested parties alone.
Secondly, these guys seem to think they write and organize such perfectly clear code that it would be trivial for any other person to look up any part of the system quickly and determine it's functionality. Your organization and/or code is never as super as you think when seen from the perspective of another. Nobody's is. A written document with pages and a table of contents will always be far more efficient and informative than raw source code ever could.
I am fearful of a bleak future where we preserve and communicate information via raw source code only... Ugh... Source code is not documentation!