Do you think the quality of video games has risen or fallen since before the turn of the millenia? Graphically, of course, but what about story and fun? Are they better or worse?
Name:
Anonymous2006-10-09 19:42
You faggot, trying to sound smart by saying "millenia". That's a plural noun, retard.
>>2
I do believe you forgot to correct his misspelling of "millennia."
Also, punctuations go inside of quotes.
Name:
Anonymous2006-10-09 22:30
compelling answers
Name:
Anonymous2006-10-10 4:53
ITT we are grammar nazis.
Name:
Anonymous2006-10-12 22:54
IGNORING IRRELEVANT GRAMMAR MATTERS
Yes, I think they have, overall. However, they are taking a disturbing turn towards the testosterone-soaked type of game that Microsoft keeps putting out, and that makes me a bit sad. The types of games that I truly enjoy are games like The New Super Mario Bros., or Katamari Damacy. I am secure in my masculinity, and don't feel the need to vicariously dominate virtual people through the protagonist. Perhaps that means I'm too old for videogames. What a sad thought.
>>6
This'll be quick.
Compare NSMB to Super Mario World, no wait let's be nicer, let's compar eit to doki doki panic instead, no actually wait fuck it, let's be meaner, let's compare it to Mario Land 2 or Wario Land. Have games gotten better?
There are much more games, however the ratio of bad to good games is still the same, which gives the appearence that games have gotten worse. there were some shitsickles back in the day. ps1 and NES were about 90% utter crap.
Name:
Anonymous2006-10-15 6:17
There were only a few good NES games, same goes for any other console. The only game that really survived the test of time was PONG...seriously...com'on almost every flash game site has their version