>>62
Its good if you want to play last generations games, which I do. On the original consoles. I don't need nintendo telling me I don't need advanced stuff because their old stuff should be good enough for me. Theres a time and a place for classic games, and it ain't with new consoles. There is more than one type of fun, like the type that comes with being able to have a 64 player, super immersive, true to life battle. Or with playing a high speed racing game with great crashes, fantastic gameplay and realistic physics. To be honest, I prefer 2D fighers, shmups and music games the most out of all games. Doesn't mean that I shouldn't have the option to play amazingly technically advanced games too as well as having an all in one media center. The Xbox 360 and the PS3 I'm sure will have many classic style games, I don't want limits set on me by Nintendo.
Also, if you don't want people who think this to buy it then you are wishing a great death on nintendo, as the only people who refuse to see the logic of what I said are just rabid Nintendofags who can't see past Miyamotos cock.
Besides, I would bet my lifes savings and everything I own upon the PS3 completely TROUNCING the "Revolution". Even if it was technically better (which it isn't), Nintendo's name is shit with anyone who isn't nintendo's bitch. (Yes, of course the only place where the Revolution will sell more than the 360 is in Japan...)
But, please tell me how the "Revolution" will win out and bankrupt sony and microsoft, and pull back. :) I eagerly await.