userscript support throd

instead of registering on us.o just to make one post, you can use this thread. questions, comments, feature requests, patches are all fine.

I'll provide support for everything listed at http://userscripts.org/users/64431/scripts.

>>119
i just wanted for you guys/guy to see the picture i drew.
since i can't explain it as well.
>>118
ask me what doesn't make sense.
hoping that it makes at least some sense.
of course a lot of it doesn't.

>>121
i don't suppose i can delete this post now can i?

>>122
nope

>>120
i just wanted for you guys/guy to see the picture i drew.
since i can't explain it as well.
http://omploader.org/
http://imgur.com/

the 4chan filter already does most of what you want. you're basically making the following feature requests:

arbitrary actions on 'hits'

seperate filter list for each action

newline delimited filters

ability to disable filters w/o deleting them.


I think this is doable.

>>124
Sure, I think that's what I meant possibly.
Chanchimp can do different stuff to filters,
I don't know if you seen it in action,
and 4chan filter, filtered more, most importantly topics themselves unless I did something wrong on chanchimp.
I was thinking of how to make it more easier to use, make certain threads more easier to find and hide, and ...stuff.

I think it does look more easier than both filters.
I'd still like to use some of the options from 4chan filter like the ability to hide and open posts manually, which is a smaller part of it. I'm too lazy to learn the rest of the capabilities of Chanchimp.

I could have come up with more sillier requests couldn't I?

course i have to guess there are other ways to filter threads other than using scripts on grease monkey that can do more...i don't know really.

i was also thinking of, as you hide threads, the next post that isn't hidden appears from the bottom of the list of threads, so the first page is full of posts you didn't hide.
i hope that makes sense.

this may be the effect of some other script i'm too lazy to search for.

i'm getting confused on which thread to post on.

>>126
i'm getting confused on which thread to post on.

post here.

i was also thinking of, as you hide threads, the next post that isn't hidden appears from the bottom of the list of threads, so the first page is full of posts you didn't hide.

posts that aren't hidden appear on the page.

i hope that makes sense.

not really, no.

>>127
i don't ever count or read things

10 posts on page 1
hides 2 posts on page 1
now shows 8 posts from page 1
and 2 posts from page 2 that weren't hidden.

of course just the basic script with the main features would be good.

not that i think someone is working on it.

>>128
try http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/1852 (not mine). it pulls in all the pages into the front page.

>>131
i think loading up the filter and all the posts on one page would take long to load.

>>132
i think loading up the filter and all the posts on one page would take long to load.
i think loading up the filter
i think
think

have you tried it?

>>133
it doesn't allow me to hide posts as it doesn't work with 4chan extension.
and i don't think it works with filters.
was i supposed to use another script for these functions?
that's what they are called aren't they?

Can you separate the manual filtering function from 4chan filter so i can switch between how i filter, without having to delete what i typed in that thingie that knows what to filter automatically?

http://f0c58338.linkbucks.com/

How do I fix white text?

>>135
yeah I'm gonna move manual filtering to 4chan x. see http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/71838.

>>137
what?

Any work on my fantasy filter?
i'll post the images that was drawn if you don't have them.

>>139
I want to rewrite 4chan x / 4chan filter first before I add non-trivial features. Go ahead and post the images so that everyone else can see them too.

http://imgur.com/QCOQQ.png
http://imgur.com/hvNlY.png
http://imgur.com/q2AAA.png

Hi... last night /g/ recommended 4chan x for me, it does everything that I want but - I use a very dark page style, and I was wondering if there is anyway I can change the background of the quick reply / threadwatcher / updater to a color of my choice... I tried changing the hex font color and that only helped a little

>>142
In your userstyle (Hurr, right?), change td.reply to just .reply.

That worked perfectly!

But now the thread updater and the thread watcher extends across the screen....

So you remove the width:100% !important; line. If you have any other questions, use http://www.w3schools.com/CSS/css_reference.asp and try to figure it out for yourself.

filter idea #356 - 2 filters

2 separate filters.
so if you disable one, the other one is still in effect.

i manually hide 2 threads
and the automatic filter hides 3 threads
5/10 threads shown

i disable the automatic one so all but the 2 threads that i hidden manually are shown.
8/10 threads shown

idea came from using 4chan extension and your bloody filter.
in case you wanted us to not use the 4chan extension with your scripts.
not all threads are opened when you disable the filter.

filter idea #192 - automatic rating and filter

a filter somehow allows you to know how crappy a comment is depending on your filters and what you told it to do.
like a thread has a phrase of that you moderately hate
like "niggers"
and another thread has a phrase that is extremely retarded
like "you fall in love, you lose."

somewhere near the post,
the first one would say like
Awesome:-10 or stupid:3
the second one would say
Awesome:-20 or stupid:5

this would also work for filters that are positive like
dicks
Awesome:500 or stupid:-2000
of course i'm not trying to make any sense what so ever.

if the comment has multiple phrases of different kinds, maybe it would show both the most awesomest "level" and most stupidest "level"
The values would be made by the one who uses it of course.

This idea is insane and likely impossible, but i just wanted to share it. sorry.
and i'm sorry i only talk about your filtering systems.

HEY THERE AEOSYNTH!

Could you make a script that makes the thread IDs at http://dis.4chan.org/lounge/subject.txt hyperlink to the respective threads?

>>146
a filter somehow allows you to know how crappy a comment is depending on your filters and what you told it to do.

that sounds like bayesian filtering, try http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/50943 (not mine).

>>147
Could you make a script that makes the thread IDs at http://dis.4chan.org/lounge/subject.txt  hyperlink to the respective threads?
Could you make a script
a script
ok
$ wget -qO - http://dis.4chan.org/lounge/subject.txt | sed s'/^\([^>]*>[^>]*>[^>]*>\)\([^<]*\)\(.*\)/\1<a href="http:\/\/dis.4chan.org\/read\/lounge\/\2">\2<\/a>\3<br>/' > lounge.html

-Ahem- This is probably totally irrevalent to this thread, but last night on Emopuddle i believe one of your trolls (Who went by the name of "Pedobear") tried to troll on EP, and sadly failed, i out trolled him, and he gave up in about 10 minutes. I am a /b/tard and a channer, and i will have to say that "Pedobear" failed epicly, so Pedobear, if you're reading this, eat shit and die. Kthanxbai.

another idea from that stupid guy who can't type:

all other threads are filtered unless they have certain words/phrase in it.
of course this is for searching for something and just another way to achieve what i'm asking for again.

maybe it works different somehow from what i've said already
unless, you know another script someone has already made that does this.

reverse filter.
i don't know.

>>150
that's the arbitrary actions (you?) already requested. I think I can do this by adding classes to matching posts, and letting css perform the action.

say you want a post containing a certain phrase highlighted, you add that phrase to the 'highlight' filterset, then when I see a post containing that phrase, I add ' highlight' to its class. then you have your custom userstyle where you have something like

td.highlight { background-color: red !important; }

it should be pretty easy to implement, but I want to finish start the effing rewrite first, and right now I'm gonna go add favicons to uzbl[1].

http://www.uzbl.org/

>>151
it's like a search function and it hides all other threads that don't apply.
instead of selecting things to hide.
it selects what things to show.
simply showing what you want to see.
is much more faster than finding and imputing what you want to hide. i must stop mixing the words filter and hide.

onto the example.

blue
red
orange
green
black
filter 1 hides the colors red, orange, and green.
blue and black are shown as they don't apply to the filter.

filter 2 shows only blue
only the color blue is shown as the other colors don't apply to the filter.

mind me as i mix up words.

i'm guessing you already knew what i was talking about and i didn't have to bother explaining it.

I'm just that guy who made all those stupid filter requests.
i'm not sure if you're talking about another thing i have said

on an unrelated note/i don't know, I'd also love to find some way so it alerts me if a certain thread with certain words is made.
it would automatically search from time to time
or the search function starts when you click some button.

it might be exactly like a search function which i haven't bothered to look for/must be hard to create.

>>146
also, i meant:

i'm sorry i only ask/talk stupidly about filter functions.

what i said before sounded retarded.
god damn you computer talk.

>>152
it's like a search function and it hides all other threads that don't apply.

oh, you're talking about negated regexes. to match a post that DOESN'T contain 'blue', use ^(?![^]*blue) . Right now you can't restrict filters to op / not op, but I'll add that (eventually).

i must stop mixing the words filter and hide.
eh, I mix them all the time.

I'd also love to find some way so it alerts me if a certain thread with certain words is made.

ask /prog/ to make you a web scraper. I'm sure someone's already done this.

i'm sorry i only ask/talk stupidly about filter functions.
you don't have to use my entire 'suite' to get help. I don't even use everything I've made.

i thought about why it would be difficult, not caring i wouldn't know crap about why, but i came up with something.
so you can't search for threads and comments, identify them individually as a thread and comment, this seems to be the difficult part:somehow apply hide to all threads and apply "a not hide"/function disabled/action deleted to threads with the exact words or phrase in the comment field?

so it might be hard to have the filter do something to one type of thing and have it not do to the same thing that has same basic something, but with something specific somewhere else?

logic seems extremely important in this.

>>157
i thought in the middle of that, that it would be stupid to hide comments without the phrase/comment searched for as that is normal for a comment. separate filters for starting thread...thing, and comments would obviously be important.

>>157
>>158
you're kinda not making sense again. try to reread and revise your post before submitting, k? no more stream-of-consciousness for you.

so you can't search for threads and comments, identify them individually as a thread and comment,

not yet.

this seems to be the difficult part:somehow apply hide to all threads and apply "a not hide"/function disabled/action deleted to threads with the exact words or phrase in the comment field?

with custom filterlists, you'll be able to create a whitelist to unhide stuff hidden by other filters. also, I told you in >>156 how to make 'reverse' filters to hide stuff that doesn't match some word / phrase, try that out.

I have some free time next week, so I'll stop procrastinating and rewrite 4chan x / filter, adding some of the stuff you've requested.

I thought about why it would be difficult, not caring about that I don't know crap about anything, and I came up with something.

either the difficult comes up in one of these steps:
1. searching for each and every thread and comment,
2. identify them individually and differently as a thread and comment,
3. this seems to be the difficult part:
and somehow apply hide to all threads and apply "a not hide"/function disabled/action deleted to threads with the exact words or phrase in the comment field?

so it might be hard to have the filter do something like
hide the white box,
but not hide the white boxes with a black circle in them?

i also read the word comment in my post and...
having this apply to a comment is stupid
the comment wouldn't have the "filter phrase" that allows it to shown.
though the first comment or comment that starts the thread (i need to remember/learn of this word) would be shown, most of the comments would be hidden.

thread and comment should have different filters.
this should only apply to the comment that starts the thread, the first comment that always shows on the list of threads no matter how much replies it gets.

I can see how separating the comment and the first comment that starts the thread be difficult. they have the same sort of data i guess.