Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Google search

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 14:08

READ CAREFULLY BEFORE REPLYING WITH WORDS THAT CONTAIN THE WORD JEW

Try and break the code.

- I just want to find a word with jew in it that's not jew, jews or jewish.
- I must use exclude variables.

I'm using
* jew * -jew -jewish -jews
and it won't give me the word jewels, jewel, jeweler, jew-jitsu, jewbilee, jewess, jewball, jew-lee, jewelry or jewelcrafter. I don't understand why. I excluded only three words (jew, jews and jewish) and jewel, jewels, jewelry, jeweler nor jewelcrafter was found in the search. What am I doing wrong.

PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU DON'T NEED TO REPLY WITH WORDS THAT CONTAIN THE WORD JEW. I JUST WANT TO KNOW THE CODE TO FIND THOSE WORDS.

when I use
* jew * jewel OR jewels -jew -jewish -jews
to find the word jewelcrafter I only find jewel or jewels. But that makes sense because jewel or jewels HAS to be in it.

Try going from:
(search string for google)
jew
jew -jew
jew -jew -jews
jew -jew -jews -jewish

the first search will give u search results of jew, jews and jewish. the second jews and jewish. the third jewish. and the fourth... nothing at all. there's no such thing as jewel or jewelcrafter, google?

What's the code?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 14:26

*jew*

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 17:52

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 18:59

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 0:58

You need to know how stupid you are.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 4:08

How stupid am I?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 20:36

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-17 1:37


     # ##### #   # #####   #    ####
     # #     #   # #      # #  #
 #   # ##    # # # ###   #   # # ###
 #   # #     ## ## #     ##### #   #
  ###  ##### #   # #     #   #  ####

     # ##### #   # #####   #    ####
     # #     #   # #      # #  #
 #   # ##    # # # ###   #   # # ###
 #   # #     ## ## #     ##### #   #
  ###  ##### #   # #     #   #  ####

     # ##### #   # #####   #    ####
     # #     #   # #      # #  #
 #   # ##    # # # ###   #   # # ###
 #   # #     ## ## #     ##### #   #
  ###  ##### #   # #     #   #  ####

     # ##### #   # #####   #    ####
     # #     #   # #      # #  #
 #   # ##    # # # ###   #   # # ###
 #   # #     ## ## #     ##### #   #
  ###  ##### #   # #     #   #  ####

     # ##### #   # #####   #    ####
     # #     #   # #      # #  #
 #   # ##    # # # ###   #   # # ###
 #   # #     ## ## #     ##### #   #
  ###  ##### #   # #     #   #  ####

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 23:19

I really don't know.
But I should.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 23:24

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 21:52

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-20 19:24

nope, jew -jew gives you no search results, because effectively you have no search term

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-30 1:23

Name: Aureax 2008-12-30 5:35

You should try *jew* -jew -jews -jewish

Put a space between jew and * and it only searches for jew effectively.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-30 5:37

>>14

Same guy, why don't you just search for jewelcrafter?

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-30 9:51

>>11
Failed pretty hard on GNAA Last measure, there!

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-30 15:56

>>16
agreed

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List