Vista vs. Linux - Which is REALLY better?

I'm sick of this "just get more ram!" bullshit. My 286 did almost as much functionality-wise as my current multi-ghz machine. Yeah, really. Sure, there was no multi-tasking, but I did the mostly the same things as I do today.
Hello, fuckers, just because you can eat ram doesn't mean you should. It costs money and also reduces the number of programs you can run.
I can see it now: in another ten years programs will have minimum footprint of 1GB, but they'll just do more of the same.

>>121
I've tryed out some Vista Distributions including Ubuntu, Mandriva and Fedora, but after all my opinion is that Vista is better.
If you don't know how it all works and didn't think trough about it, then don't even care about placing a statement about it.
Take your own advice, dipshit.

Okay, Linux got a 'free' sound format, what slows you down from using it on Windows?
You can't opt out of Vista's DRM bullshit, so your argument falls flat.

And Activation... If you write a commercial Operating System, and it took you for example 4 years to do it, do you want to see it spread like a Torrent with a crack?
Broken business model is broken.
Even Apple knows better.