processors...
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-15 14:40
ID:LXZbnI5u
I know a decent bit about computers, but I'm still not too savvy with processors
Intel® Core™ Duo Processor T2450 (2.00GHz, 2MB L2 cache, 533MHz FSB)
or
Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor T5500 (1.66GHz, 2MB L2 cache, 667MHz FSB)
which would you suggest, and why? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-15 14:57
ID:SKOraKsi
Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor T5500 (1.66GHz, 2MB L2 cache, 667MHz FSB)
Cuz moar FSB. Can overclock it if needed.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-15 20:00
ID:LauSlFEo
the core 2 duo is a dual core processor. core duo processor is single core
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-16 9:38
ID:QEn6uuWd
The Core Duo is a dual core.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-16 10:16
ID:EvqTxSMw
Your logic is retarded, dual core is better.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-16 10:58
ID:QEn6uuWd
Both are dual core, cunt.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-16 11:45
ID:EvqTxSMw
Your logic is retarded, dual core is better.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-16 14:15
ID:C4xDz7tB
>>EvqTxSMw
You're a fuckass. The original copypasta is:
Your logic is retarted. Dual core is better.
Thank you.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-16 15:05
ID:EvqTxSMw
Your logic is retarted. Dual core is better.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-16 18:20
ID:QEn6uuWd
Your logic is retarted. Dual core is better.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-16 20:26
ID:jZQZ/CQy
Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor T5500 (1.66GHz, 2MB L2 cache, 667MHz FSB) because a faster FSB means quicker loading screens and id prefer that any day
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-16 21:07
ID:uORdld/e
Since the thread has gone retarded I guess you have your answer.
Cock.
Newer Posts