Opera wins, because I currently have over a hundred tabs open and it's still just as fast as with only a one open tab.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-20 12:13 ID:ixALg2ml
>>17
You're using Linux which makes you used to the ugliness.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-20 12:47 ID:4TIZCjnQ
>>17
fail for QT. Fail for the default keyboard shortcuts. Fail for the poor customization. Good for a file manager but fail for a browser.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-20 18:05 ID:u8KFomfJ
>>18
red herring. what does that have to do with konqueror's interface
>>20
you didn't answer my question. linux's interface involves data structures and function calls and nothing to do buttons, windows or font rendering. i'm also running freebsd on my macbook
>>21
other than your opinion about default keyboard shortcuts (nobody will ever be completely content with defaults since developers are not mindreaders), you didn't qualify your objections, you've only stated them and is therefore flamebait.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-20 18:43 ID:4TIZCjnQ
>>22
"other than your opinion about default keyboard shortcuts(...) you didn't qualify your objections"
Heh, everything's just about opinions. Welcome in real life.
"you've only stated them and is therefore flamebait."
Welcome on 4chan.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-20 18:49 ID:E1hSD5ch
red herring. what does that have to do with konqueror's interface
The fact that Safari looks great and konqueror like shit
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-20 19:11 ID:u8KFomfJ
>>23
the point is i asked why konqueror's interface fails. nobody has provided any substantial argument why it does. it's just a bunch of baseless claims. oh, i've probably been on 4chan longer than you have (nov 2003)
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-20 19:35 ID:hQv0pywr
Konqueror pisses off more browser fanboys than Firefox or Opera combined!
>>25
"oh, i've probably been on 4chan longer than you have (nov 2003)"
This is what you called a "substantial argument" ? Sage for this faggotry.(and I won't tell you how long I have been here since I don't feel the need to prove you how my dick is much bigger than yours).
Konqueror has a shitty interface because "it's like this or GTFO". To take another QT browser, Opera, has a shitty default interface too (understand : that doesn't fit my needs, get my point this time retard, huh ?) but easily and fully customizable, without bloated extension like FF. Konqueror keeps its interface for web browsing AND file managing which is dumb. I like it for the second purpose, not for the first one. Period.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-20 21:35 ID:1QPe/1BJ
konqueror, like the rest of kde, is overly complicated and intimidating. all over its interface. it might be powerful, but it does not meet many peoples' needs for actual usability.
it's like, i dunno, emacs and (insert favourite gui text editor here).
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-20 23:33 ID:VKBLII40
konqueror, like the rest of kde, is overly complicated and intimidating. all over its interface. it might be powerful, but it does not meet many peoples' needs for actual usability.
CONGRATULATIONS, YOU'RE RETARDED.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-21 3:51 ID:R9uUboGD
>>28
Oh shut the FUCK up. There is nothing overly complex about KDE, the interface, its utilites or its programs. If KDE is "overly complicated", Windows must be fucking you UP. GB2/Microsoft BOB or some shit and GTFO.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-21 4:13 ID:plGjELqP
Konqueror is the simplest of browsers, it's got so few buttons and preferences I'm lost!
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-21 5:12 ID:7sX+nX/B
haha kde fanboys are insecure
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-21 8:49 ID:R9uUboGD
>>32
This is a GNOMEfag. It is made of shitstorm and ultrafail.