Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

SATA I vs. SATA II

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-15 17:01

I just bought a new Seagate SATA-II hard drive to add to my storage space.  Right now it's recognized as a SATA-I HDD in BIOS, which leads to two questions.  1)Is it worth the effort to change it/is SATA-II that much faster, and 2)How would I fix it so it's recognized as SATA-II? 

I have a suspicion it's the jumpers in back, but the way my drives are mounted in my case it would be a bitch to take it out just to change the jumper and find out that's not it.  So what do I do, /comp/?

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-15 17:21

>>1
1. Take it out.
2. Remove the jumper.
3. Change the voltage switch at the back of your computer.
4. Put the jumper back.
5. Put it in.
6. Turn your computer on.
7. ????
8. Profit.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-15 17:25

>>2
Haha, fuck you.

A little more creative than "delete system32" I guess.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-15 22:03

This thread is relevant to my interests. I would like to know if SATA II means anything, all I know is that it's backwards compatible with SATA I.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-15 23:51

>>4
SATA II is twice as fast as SATA I.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-16 0:17

>>5
Yes, but as far as I recall hard drives are still nowhere near as fast as SATA I. And isn't there other stuff like native command queuing, maybe that hybrid thing, blah blah blah? It's confusing.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-16 11:44

Fast SATA is fast... you don't need more

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-16 14:28

>>6
7200RPM drives can't internally read and write fast enough to saturate a SATA I (aka SATA, SATA 150) connection. In fact, only the fastest, least fragmented 7200 RPM drives can even come close to needing SATA I over ATA 133 (though you'd see a difference between ATA 100 and ATA 133). SATA II is only useful for 10,000 and 15,000 RPM drives

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-16 15:41

>>8
hi ihave a 100000rpm drive what do i use for speeed enough ;)?

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-16 23:42

Sata III gonna have 6gb/s

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-17 7:56

SATA II IS OVER NINE THOUSAND

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-18 0:46

I dislike SATA because their little cables have no hold to them. Its like they can just fall the fuck out of the slot....

Maybe its just my equipment but I have heard of this complaint before.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-18 2:14

>>13
I believe a lot\all of new SATA equipment has a newer snap-lock plug. Might be wrong though.

They're certainly not tough motherfuckers like IDE ribbons. Those require the combined strength of a thousand men to remove sometimes.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List