>>11
Well, sure, okay, Linux shows that you can be RAM-efficient and offer 3D stuff. I don't think that changes much if all you want to use is Windows, though, like the OP probably does for various reasons outside the scope of this thread. My point still stands, Vista costs a little more RAM for a significant bunch of tweaks and new features. The bloat rate is probably no different than it was before, there's just new crap piled on top of it to make use of faster computers, just like the evolution of pretty much all OSes that weren't the first few years of OS X.
>>12
You're dumb. Who the fuck cares about DRM that you don't have to use and 200mb of RAM you probably already had free? This casts further doubt on the authenticity of point 6.