AMD vs Intel - dual

Hello,

Witch one is better;

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 

OR

Intel Core 2 Duo E6400?

I've looked at benchmarks and Core 2 Duo does kick AMD's ass, HOWEVER, E6400 is never on the benchmarks, and I can't afford anything better.
Does it still kick AMD's ass?

>>16
Yes, divided by them, stupid. Performance alone is useless. Price alone is useless. You divide performance by price, and obtain a ratio of how good you are using your money. Sum processor and required fan, motherboard and RAM for proper comparison.

>>17
Truth, but again, please introduce price in the equation, otherwise you're wasting your time.

>>18
The ricer idiot is back:
1. It may be the fastest, but it's useless if it doesn't have a competitive price, because unless you want the very very best, you just set a budget and get the fastest processor FOR THAT BUDGET FOR FUCKING GOD'S DAMN SAKE. And for a fixed budget, last time I compared them, AMD was still doing better, even though I must point out that I don't care if it's AMD or Intel, all I care for is who does it better for the buck.
2. Your logic is retarded. Performance alone is of little relevance.
3. Your logic is retarded. Performance alone is of little relevance.
4. Your logic is retarded. Performance alone is of little relevance.