YOU FUCKING DOUCHEBAGS DON'T NEED A FIREWALL IF YOU PUT A ROUTER IN FRONT OF YOU
THE ONLY REASON TO HAVE A FIREWALL IS IF YOU ARE A STUPID BUSINESSMAN WITH A LAPTOP WHO HANGS OUT IN STARBUX WITH A DICK UP YOUR ASS
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-31 9:05
>>9
Lol, true. For all the purposes I need, firewall is interchangeable with router. I just need a device which does NAT between two Ethernet interfaces, whatever it's called.
ANYWAY, >>9, for those of us who are forced to use winblows, for whatever reason, a process-based firewall is very useful and even necessary, esp. if your version of Windows is less than 100% legal.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-31 11:57
>>1
Preferrably one that doesn't disconnect you on DCC SEND ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-31 14:11
Sygate (last version before being killed by symantec) works well for me, very light on resources. Zonealarm Pro is actually really good, if your system can handle it.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-31 15:28
>>12
you do not know what the fuck you are talking about
are you seriously afraid your pirated windows is going to report you to the fbi
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-31 15:29
>>14
omg you are so wrong on so many levels it is horribly disturbing
you are more wrong than the black guy in the horror movie who hears the squishy noises and goes to see what is going on
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-31 15:39
>>15
No, but you never know what a freshly installed program of that nature may do internetwise. Best to be safe anyway.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-31 15:46
Programs should not access the Internet without your permission, or unless they explicity say so before installation.