Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Safari Browser

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-06 21:19

Give me a reason why Safari is worth using compared to lets say Firefox?? Other than eye-candy

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-07 0:47

Firefox is not stable in some distributions and you don't feel like cracking opera for no ads

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-07 1:38

Opera is free, it doesn't have any ads. Has been that way since the first release of 8.5.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-07 5:29

>>3
``Free software'' is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of ``free'' as in ``free speech,'' not as in ``free beer.''

Free software is a matter of the users' freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. More precisely, it refers to four kinds of freedom, for the users of the software:

    * The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
    * The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
    * The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).
    * The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits (freedom 3). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

A program is free software if users have all of these freedoms. Thus, you should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to anyone anywhere. Being free to do these things means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission.

You should also have the freedom to make modifications and use them privately in your own work or play, without even mentioning that they exist. If you do publish your changes, you should not be required to notify anyone in particular, or in any particular way.

The freedom to use a program means the freedom for any kind of person or organization to use it on any kind of computer system, for any kind of overall job, and without being required to communicate subsequently with the developer or any other specific entity.

The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable forms of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and unmodified versions. (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary for conveniently installable free operating systems.) It is ok if there is no way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program (since some languages don't support that feature), but you must have the freedom to redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to make them.

In order for the freedoms to make changes, and to publish improved versions, to be meaningful, you must have access to the source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a necessary condition for free software.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-07 5:52

>>4 completely missed the point. And oh, btw, stop confusing free with open source.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-07 6:09

haha, I love it. browser wars again.
let me put it this way:
I use firefox 'cos I like it.
I don't use Opera because I don't like it.
it's as simple as that. I'm not about to try convert anyone from their browser, and frankly I don't give a flying fuck what browser they use. it really doesn't matter either way just as long as you can convince someone to stop using IE. (yes, IE is my one exception to the "no joining browser wars" rule.)

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-07 10:47

Konqueror

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List