Win2k > WinXP?

I'm fucking sick of using linux on my laptop.

This IBM R30 originally came with win2k (ex-corporate laptop) and I just put XP on it now so I can either install Win2k or just leave XP on it.

Primarily will be using it to code, word/access and possibly play the old nostaglic game.
Which one is more secure (even though largely it's up to user) and which one has better performance?

So, /comp, win2k or XP?

Which one is more secure (even though largely it's up to user) and which one has better performance?

This is a rhetorical question, right?

Unix lol

Wait, let me get this straight. It came with Windows 2000. You then put Windows XP on it. As a result you're sick of using GNAA/Lunix?

I don't get it.

But ignoring your inability to make sense, most people are aware that XP is just 2K with a bunch of bloat to remind people that performance and stability is for wimps. Having said that, Microsloth hasn't been supporting 2K for some time, so there are likely to known unpatched holes in it. At least XP still gets security patches on a regular basis, even if SP2 does slow your computer to a crawl.

In conclusion, use lunix lol.

Windows 2000. Same core, less bloat, more stable and fast, great for development and gaming.