House of Leaves fucking sucks. One big gimmick after enough. Read Borges, faggot.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-07 20:37
Shakespeare: Complete works
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-07 20:39
definitely Frankenstien
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-07 20:40
House of Leaves is creative, it's interesting, but it's not essential reading. It's like the "Fight Club" movie, so many douche bags think it's the best thing ever. I admit I fell for the hype and bought it.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-07 20:40
How about some On the Origin of Species up in here.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-07 20:54
Owning books is not necessary, there are libraries in the world.
On the rare chance that I do buy a book, it is donated to the library after I read it. After I read a book once, it becomes dull.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-07 22:05
>>11
If that's the case then I'm afraid you don't know how to read books.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-08 0:57
>>11 Books become dull to you once you've read them? How does that even make any sense? I often fine the second read to be better than the first.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-08 1:07
ITT: pretentious faggots hatin as usual
carry on
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-08 3:56
Secondng Shakespeare
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-08 8:20
homer virgil dante chaucer cervantes shakespeare milton
Implying that the Bible has any real literary merit and that reading the cliffnotes version wouldn't be sufficient.
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-10 5:07
>>23
Actually neither of those things were implied. Not that they're incorrect
Name:
Anonymous2010-01-10 7:55
>>23
Please take your "implying" back to /b/ with you. It is not a literary tactic worthy of using on this fine board. Also, please remember to take your adolescent knee-jerk badmouthing of Christianity as well.