Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Reading fast

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 9:22

Okay, so I was sitting on the train reading and this woman next to me is reading a page in like 15 seconds or something. I read very slowy and haven't read many books in my life but would like to improve. Is this something that just comes with time? Or do you have to not be born a faggot?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 13:36

>>1
Not being born a faggot helps, but with practice you may read nearly as fast as someone like me.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 13:41

You can't read any worthwhile book that fast and process the information. How fast you can process the material is what limits your speed, not how fast you can read. The silly woman was probably just skim reading.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 18:29

>>3
More likely reading a non-worthwhile book.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 19:15

There are different degrees of information processing. She was making a map of the plot, characters, interactions, etc., and letting the story fill in the relationships among these abstract entities. That's what I do when I have something to read for college, cuz let's face it; ain't no worthwhile literature that a professors makes you read.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 19:49

>>5
People like you are terrible.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 20:26

It's called speed reading.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_reading

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 20:36

>>7
And it will rape your ability to take in the book. Only useful for reading worthless garbage that you're just trying to finish because you hate to quit in the middle (e.g. Wyrm, by Mark Fabit).

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 20:54

>>8
Fabi, that is.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 22:19

>>6
How so?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 22:33

>>10
It's self-evident, unless you were being wholly sarcastic in the last sentence.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-26 1:25

>>11
I wasn't. I don't find regurgitated classics to be very interesting.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-26 2:40

>>12
What do you consider 'worthwhile literature' then?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-26 3:36

>>3,8
So can I improve my information processing by reading lots? I don't want to rip through a book in an hour or anything, I just have a lot of books I want to read and I don't want it to take forever to get through just one.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-26 4:07

Fuckeng hell, this one of the worse inventions women made. Retarded creatures, they are.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-26 6:58

>>13
he probably reads fantasy books, lol

fantasy is for big gay babies

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-26 11:04

>>3
Yeah she was probably just skipping to the romance scene lol.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-26 15:40

>>14
Yes. I call it "practice".

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 18:19

Your reading speed will improve very fast if you just pick up a book and start reading. When I was little my first "real" novel was The Hobbit. I don't remember how many pages it has, but probably less than 300, and it took me weeks to finish it. Today I can read through a simmilar book in two or three hours.

Also some books are an easier read than others, which has a huge impact on my speed. Maybe the woman was just reading something shallow in massive print, (not to sound mysoginistic, but I never saw a woman read what I would consider a real book).

Most importantly you only live once and reading speed shouldn't be your concern, just have fun.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 3:35

>>19
I took a quick glance at it and I'm pretty sure it was some trashy romance novel. Thanks for the help by the way.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 6:21

>>19
300 pages
two or three hours.
Enjoy your comic books.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 7:38

300 pages, 2 500 symbols per page, is about 750 000 symbols. Normal, adequate and attentive reader generally does about 70 000 symbols per hour. A 750 000 symbol page book, thus, reads in about ten hours; 2 or even 3 hours less if you're real fast. A 750k book in 3 hours is 250k symbols per hour, which is about 3.5 times faster than normal attentive reading, and perhaps 3.5 times more - prohibiting - in terms of experiencing art.

15 seconds per page is very strange. Normal attentive reading speed is around 15-19 symbols per second (about 3 words per second - that quite fast, isn't it). In 15 seconds such a normal reader would devour about 290 symbols, which is about 1/8th of a normal page. So, either the woman was reading at eight times the speed of already fast attentive reading; or her page contained 8 times less symbols, which is about 48 words per page, likely being a preschool kid's picture-book or similar. Either way, the woman was an idiot for either skipping 7/8th of each page, or reading a preschooler's book on a public train.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-08 0:53

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-09 1:47

>>1
there are speed reading courses that are very effective

the basic theory (tried and true, no-bullshit for reals, yo) is that when you read a book, you (if you are moderately literate) recognize words as indivisible units so you don't read C-A-T as three letters, but recognize the shape of the letters together to be "cat"

through speed reading you learn to recognize longer strings of characters as single units and instantly understand them

eventually you get to see entire lines of text as a single unit, allowing your reading to be very fast

there are a few people who SUPPOSEDLY can read entire pages in this fashion, but i've never met one

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-09 7:48

>>24
And when you have learned this pointless method and embedded it into your head for good, have fun enocuntering a new word and having your brain assplode.

I say, if you don't want to read it slowly and carefully, you don't want to read it at all. All or nothing. Speed reading is pointless. It's no fun? Throw it away.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-09 15:34

>>25
Some of us have a lot of books to read.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-09 16:07

>>25
But nice attempt to justify your slow reading.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-09 16:55

>>27
Shitty attempt to justify being an impatient faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-09 21:33

>>28
Gee, I'm sorry I'm not intested in getting dumber.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-09 21:39

>>29
learning to read faster won't make you any smurter, I kind of doubt anything could at this point...........

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-09 21:53

>>30
But to read slower I would have to be damber.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List