>>33
"Dracul" was historical Dracula's old man; that's why his son used to call himself "Dracula", which - yea - means "son of the Devil". Dracul is the word for Devil; "dragon" was synonymous with "devil", and in Hungarian language there only was one word for both.
>>32
>Wallachian. Not hungarian
Except Wallachia was a historical (and political) part of Hungary, Anon.
>>34
What are you quoting? Anyway, how come Stoker even found or constructed the word otherwise? He didn't know no hungarian tongue. Now, creativity is ability to properly hide your sources, says Einstein; and while Stoker didn't do enough of THAT kind of creativity to trick everyone, he still seems to have managed to fool some silly gullible people like your person, it seems.