>>9
There's nothing to be solved. Writing dull depictions of one's own (and nobody's else) psychology in insanely inaccurate metaphors - that's philosophy.
Bringing pleasure and joy outside oneself - that's art. (Now, bringing sorrow, hate and pain samewise - that's shitty art.)
As simple as that. Art has many problems, but philosophy is simple. I'm talking about what's called philosophy, not the REAL philosophy. Certainly Darwing and Einstein were incredible, but you don't recommend their works as philosophy, even though that's where the beauty of thought and real possibilities of thought knocking on the doors of truth about humankind and universe resides - because you're too dull, or tired, or whatever, to read anything senseful, I gather. So, better off reading some fantastic nonsence with no meaning or application, neither any artistic form to support it, right? Girls LOVE philosophy, after all, so why not use it to have a chat in female taste - pointless, but with the use of clever words; it might lead to reproduction, after all.