Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Stupid books that you like

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-19 22:06

What are some books that have little to no literary value, that you have enjoyed reading?

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-19 23:35

The Bible.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-20 1:16

gossip girl

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-20 8:20

babar and the ghost

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-20 21:27

Harry Potter. >.< I had to know who snape was and why he killed the dumbledor ok?!? ...Now I'm one of those Snape fan-girly things that haunt the dark corners of AdultFanFiction.net

Also there's a book, I can't remeber the title, (and I lent it to someone who never returned it >.<) which, starting in ancient Egypt and moving up to 1995, catalogs perverted historical texts, rumors, and mythology. (The story of how Egyptian goddess Isis got pregnant by having sex with the corpse of her husband, Anything involving greek gods, the homo-sexual tendencies of Julius Ceasar, King Henry the 8th's wives, pages from records of witch-trials where people describe having sex with satan, J. Edgar Hoover, etc)

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-21 0:16

>>5
oh dear god. i think you just renewed my interest in books.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-21 8:37

Al-Quran!

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-21 14:56

Al means The lol

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-21 20:29

Dan Brown's books. I can't speak for the Da Vinci code particularly, but if it's like his other books (Digital Fortress in particular) than it only sounds intillectual to those completley clueless about the subject. Luckily not many people are experts on Da Vinci's artwork or religious symbology.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-22 20:48

>>6
I've tried finding another copy everywhere too. Amazon.com everywhere.. The illustration on the front is this row of books and the book-ends are asses, and there are arms and legs coming out from between the pages of the books at all angles with the arms grabing the ass book-ends and the ankles of the legs.
The BEST chapter is the one on the witches because they go into incredible detail, an it's quoted from an actuall document made at the trial. They said that the devil turned into animals like a dog, horse, stag, etc and had sex with them, that he had sex with 10-15 of them one after the other, that in his "human" from his dick was as long as him forearm, and that when he came there was gallons of juzz that streched out their bellies, that his jizz was icecold, that they were gang raped by monsters while he watched. It's just like anything you can find in hentai manga today, only it's a historical document. And if anyone questions "what the fuck is this?!?!" ... it's a history lesson, bitches.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-10 16:05

>>4
:3

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-10 16:40

"How Opal Mehta Got a Lipo, Silicone Boobs, a Tan, And Got Wild"

What? It's a plagiarized book of a plagiarized book. Or it could be. I'd read a book with a title like that.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-12 1:36

>>9

I should have put it down when I got to "swimsuit model with a doctorate".

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-12 23:42

i read chick lit. there's absolutely nothing prosaic about these books, but in my defense it's not that different from watching lame teen shows like the oc (i watch that too) or brainless action movies.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-13 1:51

>>14 fucked in the ass

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-13 11:45

>>2
Yay for trolls.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-13 15:47

harry potter lol

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-13 23:00

>>14
i'd rather be a man who read chick lit than a woman. trust me.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-14 4:32

Some of that chick lit is HARDCORE.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-25 21:34

Anyone remember a book called "Weapon"?  It involved an android protaganist named Solo.  Damned action-packed fluff, but fun all the same.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-25 22:25

i read... animorphs

O GOD DONT LOOK AT ME :(

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-26 19:24

>>21
No one wants to. Now go back to reading RL Stien. Teenybooper.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-27 16:30

Anything by Harry Turtledove. Massive repetition(if I read once more about Sam Carsten's zinc ointment/some losers blown off penis/whatever, I'll shoot somebody), horrible sex scenes(oh boy, now that nazi-type got a raging hard-on from a political rally, let's see him rape his slutty wife), and "maybe he did, maybe he didn't" crud. Really, the man could write blindfolded and probably does. Still, I chow down his material like a lunatic.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-30 15:56

Why do all of Harry Turtledove's (I swear that's a pseudonym) books have an important looking cover?  I mean, the cover just looks like the book is an instant classic, a respected work of fiction, with a timeless sounding title that will be remembered for ages, and then the reviews are like "what the hell."

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 16:23

http://www.sfsite.com/~silverag/turtledove.html
(notice the hippie in the middle - that's him)
His pseydonym was Eric Iverson. I read somewhere he used it because people wouldn't believe Turtledove was his real name.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 16:32

http://www.scifi.com/sfw/interviews/sfw9318.html

Why did you write Wereblood and Werenight under a pseudonym?

Turtledove: My publisher gave me that pseudonym on the grounds that no one would believe that Turtledove—which is my real name—was my real name. I had no choice in the matter.

I was just starting to be known under my pseudonym of Eric Iverson. I kept the pen name for a while. I was also publishing academic nonfiction. I thought it might be useful to have one name for the fiction and one name for the nonfiction.

When I sold the four books of the Videssos Cycle to Lester del Rey [of Del Rey Books], Lester said, "I'm going to give you your real name back, because people will remember it."

I may be the only writer around who has both his pen name and his own name opposed on him by force [laughs].

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-05 20:38

ptobably the stupidest books i like are terry pratchett's... it's like candy for the brain.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-05 21:07

>>27
If by "stupidest" you mean "most amusing" then yes. How are Pratchett's books stupid?

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-05 21:57

Well, they're kinda stupid if you don't get the references, I guess. And if you have the attention span of an American President.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-17 14:20

>>5 i second this

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-17 14:21

>>6
i second (oops)

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-17 18:51

>>29
You don't have to get the references, everything is purely logical either way.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-18 3:06

>>20
You know they made a movie of the book (called "Solo") and it had Mario Van Peebles as Solo.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-18 4:56

I like the Koran, cuz it allows me to behead people I don't like, fly airplanes into buildings and rape little girls like Mohammed did. ALLAHU AKBAR!

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-24 3:10

>>5
I was going to say that. T_T
Except I'm not a girly-fan whatever.

However, I add the Claremont/Lucas Shadow trilogy as a series of stupid books that I like. Shadow Moon, Shadow Dawn, Shadow Star. These books continue the story of Willow.

They're so good they're bad.


/j.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-26 1:11

Explain.

Name: 2000 gmc yukon 2006-07-07 12:32

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-07 12:54

what is books

Name: 2000 gmc yukon 2006-07-07 16:43

Name: 2000 gmc yukon 2006-07-07 17:53


Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List